Africa and Balkans See Progress in Human Rights. U.S. Annual Report Views the State of the World
<a href=www.zenit.org>ZENIT - The World Seen From Rome
Date: 2003-04-05
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 5, 2003 (Zenit.org).- On Monday Colin Powell released the U.S. State Department's "2002 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices." In his remarks the U.S. secretary of state reaffirmed his country's resolve to extend respect for human rights around the world.
The report comes at a time when the United States itself is under heavy criticism for its pre-emptive war on Iraq. Be that as it may, Powell explained that the Bush administration's efforts to improve human rights involves a variety of means: working with government leaders, non-governmental organizations, and free trade unions; fostering accountable governance and encouraging political, legal and economic reforms; channeling development assistance to nations that govern justly; supporting the rule of law, independent media, religious liberty and the rights of minorities.
The report gives detailed information on no fewer than 196 countries. Not all is negative. Positive developments included the progress in establishing democratic institutions in East Timor, and improvements in civil liberties in Taiwan. Turkey also approved laws covering freedom of speech, political activity and association, and fair trials.
In the Balkans, Bosnia and Herzegovina held its first general elections conducted by local authorities since the Dayton Peace Accords. Macedonia held elections, and its Parliament completed a number of constitutional and legislative reforms. In terms of political rights the report held out hope that Kenya's free election and peaceful transfer of power last December could mean a consolidation of democracy.
There was positive news concerning some domestic conflicts. Sri Lanka saw progress last year in the implementing of a cease-fire agreement between the government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil-Eelam. Sierra Leone saw an end to its civil war, and peaceful elections were held in May.
An end to conflict also came about in Angola, where the former UNITA rebel movement has disarmed and is transforming into a political party. This has led to a notable decrease in human rights abuses, even though some problems remain. In Afghanistan the new regime has implemented human rights improvements, including women and ethnic minorities serving in the government. And an estimated 1 million girls are back in school.
Ex-Soviet republics
As for the bad news, the State Department reported problems in several republics of the former Soviet Union. In Turkmenistan an attack on President Saparmurat Niyazov's motorcade last November led to widespread arrests, forced evictions of suspects' families, use of torture, threats of rape and summary trials. In Kazakhstan an already poor human rights record worsened. Opposition leaders were selectively prosecuted and the media harassed.
Uzbekistan saw some positive developments, but there were also at least four deaths in detention due to torture. In Kyrgyzstan, harassment of the media continued, and police killed six unarmed protesters in one confrontation.
In the Chechnya conflict, Russian forces and Chechen rebels continued to commit serious human rights violations. The U.S. State Department accused government forces of committing extrajudicial killings and of using indiscriminate force, resulting in civilian casualties. For their part, Chechen rebels increased their killings of civilian officials and militia associated with the Russian-appointed Chechen administration.
Civil strife also led to widespread human rights abuses in Nepal. The Maoist guerrillas resort to killings, bombing, torture and forced conscription of children. Government forces, meanwhile, were accused of killing civilians and abusing others suspected of Maoist sympathies.
Asian powers assailed
The State Department had strong words concerning human rights in China: "Citizens lacked both the freedom to peacefully express opposition to the party-led political system and the right to change their national leaders or form of government."
While the Chinese Constitution provides for an independent judiciary, in practice the government and the Communist Party frequently interfered in the judicial process and directed verdicts in many high-profile cases. The various bodies making up the security apparatus were also accused of numerous human rights abuses. China's family planning policy also came in for criticism. Repressive measures include fines for those who have more than one child, forced abortion and sterilization, and obligatory insertion of IUDs.
China made efforts at the start of 2002 to improve the rights situation. It freed a number of prominent dissidents, allowed the Dalai Lama to visit, and reformed the legal system. But these positive developments were undermined by arrests of democracy activists, the imposition of death sentences without due process on two Tibetans, and the trials of labor leaders on "subversion" charges, the U.S. report said. As well, authorities rapidly suppressed religious, political and social groups that they perceived to be a threat to government power or national stability.
In North Korea, the government's human rights record remained poor, noted the report. Citizens cannot change the country's rulers, and the leadership "viewed most international human rights norms, particularly individual rights, as illegitimate, alien and subversive to the goals of the State and Party."
Failings in human rights include extrajudicial killings, disappearances, arbitrary detentions, torture, the lack of an independent judiciary, denial of freedom of speech, tight control of all forms of cultural and media activities, and restrictions on freedom of religion and worker rights.
Mixed results in Latin America
In Latin America the human rights situation is a mixed bag. In a number of other countries -- Argentina, Bolivia, Chile and Paraguay -- the report noted that in spite of some problems governments generally respected human rights.
Greater concern was expressed over Brazil. While the federal authorities do generally respected human rights, "there continued to be numerous serious abuses, and the record of some state governments was poor," noted the report.
State police forces committed many extrajudicial killings, tortured and beat suspects under interrogation, and arbitrarily arrested and detained persons. Police were also implicated in a variety of criminal activities, including killings for hire, death squad executions, extortion, kidnappings for ransom, and narcotics trafficking.
Elsewhere, the situation was even worse. Colombia had free and fair elections, but "the government's human rights record remained poor," according to the report. In spite of efforts to improve laws and institutional mechanisms, there was a lack of implementation.
Moreover, some members of the government security forces continued to commit serious abuses, as well as collaborating with paramilitary groups that committed serious abuses. As for the judiciary, it is inefficient, overburdened by a large backlog, and undermined by corruption and intimidation, the U.S. report said.
Guerrillas too, particularly the FARC, were responsible for a large percentage of civilian deaths. Guerrillas killed politicians, journalists, labor union members and numerous religious leaders. And the FARC continued to kidnap, torture and kill off-duty members of the public security forces. Guerrillas also continued to kidnap thousands of civilians to help finance subversion and put political pressure on the government.
In Venezuela, the government's human rights record remained poor. Vigilante killings, torture by the security forces, harsh prison conditions and arbitrary arrests were some of the abuses singled out by the report. President Hugo Chávez also came in for censure. His frequent criticisms of the media, opposition groups and the Church were interpreted by many "as tacit approval of violence."
Cuba, labeled as "a totalitarian state controlled by Fidel Castro," was strongly condemned for human rights abuses. A rubber-stamp Parliament, party control of the judiciary and security forces, active suppression of political opposition, prison beatings, and control of the media were some of the aspects covered in the report. Moreover, the security forces were accused of committing numerous, serious human rights abuses. Worldwide, civil liberties can still be a scarce commodity.
Venezuelan diplomat calls on UN to set up HR observation post in Venezuela
<a href=www.vheadline.com>Venezuela's Electronic News
Posted: Friday, April 04, 2003
By: Patrick J. O'Donoghue
Andean Commission of Jurists has announced that it has sent a report to the United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) warning that President Hugo Chavez Frias attempting to monopolize State organs and institutions.
Speaking on behalf of the Jurists, Venezuelan Enrique ter Horst claims that President Hugo Chavez Frias' insistence on carrying through his political project is fast losing the legitimacy he gained in winning two presidential elections. " The absence of advances in government-opposition negotiations has kept alive the temptation among the radicals on both sides to seek a quick fix to the political crisis"
Ter Horst proposes that the UN open a human rights observation post in Venezuela to investigate and generate confidence in an electoral solution.
The former UN diplomat accuses Chavez Frias of:
- Violating the principle of separation of State powers
- Placing unconditional supporters to head public institutions
- Firing up social hatred
- Organizing armed bands to attack opponents. "Last year there were 50 deaths and more than 700 injuries during pacific marches, sabotaging investigations into deaths of opponents"
- Using judges and state prosecutors at his service to politically persecute opposition leaders
- Allowing security agents or supporters to attack 200 journalists
- Diverting the Armed Force (FAN) from its constitutional mandate
- Allocating exchange control permits at whim.
Enrique Ter Horst has been in charge of UN special missions on Haiti and El Salvador, as well as UN Adjunct High Commissioner for Human Rights (1998).
Venezuelan Foreign Minister disputes US State Department human rights report
<a href=www.vheadline.com>Venezuela's Electronic News
Posted: Thursday, April 03, 2003
By: Patrick J. O'Donoghue
Venezuelan Foreign Minister Roy Chaderton Matos has reacted negatively to the US State Department annual human rights report. Stating emphatically that there is no violation of human rights in Venezuela, Chaderton Matos admits mistakes have been made but there is a public debate.
"Reports by certain international judges must be taken with caution, especially when they touch on such delicate matters as violence."
Replying as Venezuelan Ministers are wont to do, the Foreign Minister hits out at" levels of influence" in many countries that promote themselves as the judges of other countries' conduct ... "we have to live with that and express our disagreement when there are motives to do so."
Venezuela, Chaderton Matos comments, could draw up a human rights report on other countries but it would not be the right moment since the world is in the middle of a war.
The US State Department report highlights documented summary killings (by Venezuelan police forces) that have gone unpunished, cases of torture in prison and generalized police abuses.
News From the Washington file: Western Hemisphere Human Rights Record Mixed, State Department Says
01 April 2003
By Scott Miller
<a href=usinfo.state.gov>Washington File Staff Writer
(Most governments respected citizens' rights, though problems persist) (1040)
Washington -- The majority of governments in the Western Hemisphere respected the human rights of their citizens in 2002, though problems persist in many of these countries as well as in other nations that received poor evaluations in the Department of State's 2002 human rights report.
........
Among the hemispheric nations that the State Department's "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2002", released on March 31, ranked as having a poor human rights record were Cuba, Haiti, Venezuela, and Colombia.
As in Haiti, member's of Venezuela's security forces committed "numerous and serious abuses" in 2002. Despite improvements in some areas, the Venezuelan government's human rights records remained poor.
The report found that Venezuela's police and military committed extrajudicial killings of criminal suspects, with police allegedly linked to vigilante death squads responsible for dozens of killings.
Investigations into forced disappearances by security forces remained extremely slow, the report noted, and the government failed to punish police and security officers guilty of abuses.
Arbitrary arrests and detentions in Venezuela increased in 2002, and impunity was "one of the country's most serious human rights
problems."
Police rarely arrested suspects, the report said, and when they did, often the suspects were soon set free. Crimes involving human rights abuses did not proceed to trial due to delays, the report added.
Government intimidation was another serious problem in Venezuela in 2002 as the president, officials in his administration, and member of his political party frequently spoke out against the media, the political opposition, labors unions, the courts, the Catholic Church and human rights groups.
Many persons interpreted these remarks as tacit approval for violence, and threatened, intimidated or physically harmed individuals opposing the government, the report found.
Immediately proceeding a temporary alteration of constitutional authority in April, the government of briefly deposed president Hugo Chavez abused its power by requiring television and radio stations to broadcast speeches favorable to the government and by cutting the transmission of television stations that refused to do so, the report said.
........
The full text of Western Hemisphere section of the 2002 Human Rights Report is available at: www.state.gov
(The Washington File is a product of the Office of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: usinfo.state.gov)
This site is produced and maintained by the U.S. Department of State's Office of International Information Programs (usinfo.state.gov). Links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein.