The Rediff Special/Rajgopal Nidamboor Rajgopal Nidamboor | May 13, 2003

The recent, shameful exposé of a band of Indian athletes "caught in the act" for using performance-enhancing drugs is just the tip of the iceberg. A wittingly, or unwittingly, enacted "fall-out" of what made anabolic steroids, and the Ben Johnsons, household "exemplars," and earned the wrath of the denizens who control sports and/or the Olympic movement...

That's not all. On the other side of the spectrum, "Golden Girl" Flo Jo fell a victim to the steroidal panache, just as much as sporting nobles like Carl Lewis became "tainted" with drug allegations, and every sport meet had its own share of "drug-abuse" skeletons in the cupboard… All the same, the chemical athlete of today has often been snared by stringent drug testing devices -- now in use, worldwide. But, life, of course, is a basic reality -- of which everything else is a form of manifestation, including the doping phenomenon, and its effects on the human body. Hence, every possible "remedy" to curtail it seems to be worse than the malady per se. An update.

First, the basics. An anabolic steroid is a substance that aims at promoting tissue growth, especially through stimulation of cellular protein -- its production, to be precise. And, while each type of steroid used exerts its peculiar effects in the body, athletes almost, as a norm, use those with chemical structures akin to the chief male hormone, testosterone. Also, steroids, without doubt, have masculinising, or androgenic, action/s. This is precisely the reason why they are, sometimes, labelled as androgenic-anabolic steroids.

The use of synthetic derivatives of testosterone dates back to the post-World War II sports scenario, when they were first "employed" by a handful of weightlifters and bodybuilders. Things came to a head when over a dozen athletes were disqualified during the 1983 Pan American Games in Caracas, Venezuela, for using anabolic steroids before the competition. It became clear, thereafter, that the menacing influence of drugs was not ethnic to sportspersons of the erstwhile Soviet-bloc countries. What's more, it was also the first time a very sensitive analytical technique was used to determine and screen the athletes' urine sample/s for the presence of steroids, whose use was, covertly or overtly, resorted to improving muscular size, strength, endurance, and sports performance.

Now -- a bit of history. A whole new world of experimentation with anabolic steroids, by sportspersons, began with the advent of oral steroids, in 1958. Awakened by economic prospects, and with the view of making them more effective, drug manufactures altered the steroid molecules so that they would not meet with rapid doom when they passed through the liver. It has now been well established that this grand design in steroidal composition is associated with one of the most serious of side-effects -- liver disease; most likely, cancer.

The most colourful effect of steroid use is its virilising purport -- with the availability of a varied range of drugs with minimal masculinising side-effects. Yet, it goes without saying that most athletes reckon that the androgenic effects, whatever their impact, are a sine qua non for elevating aggression levels -- levels that promote continued and strenuous training, scientific, biomechanical, or call it by any other name. And, you have it all well laid out: the purpose of inculcating a definitive advantage -- or, extra force for limb movements. However, controversy dogs the power and effectiveness of steroidal use in male athletes, what with their inherently adequate levels of testosterone.

Sport, in recent years, has been nothing short of an industry. And, while champion material is being tapped in schools, so has drug power. It is also evident that coaches and trainers either recommend, or administer, drugs to their wards with the hope of fulfilling their fond dreams; they may even help them "customise" a number of steroidal regimens too. In combination, or otherwise. While transgression of dosage schedules are not uncommon, athletes have always prayed that a specific steroidal diet would only cause less harmful side-effects, and maximum effect on field performance. The equation is, however, not so simplistic.

While weightlifters have cyclical steroidal dosages, in combination with hormones, such as thyroid, to speed up metabolism, reduce appetite, and fat deposits under the skin, athletes have used a host of fanciful drugs experimentally, and carelessly. Some examples: the growth hormone extracted from human cadavers; HCG; grand doses of vitamins and minerals; bee pollen; amino acids; and, anything that holds promise to improving the levels of athletic competitiveness. The adage? More, the merrier. The sermon? Side-effects, if any, would be reversible upon cessation of drug [ab]use.

Each time an athlete takes a drug, which has no relevance to any form of ethical therapy, it changes his/her ability to function normally. While some drugs increase alertness and performance, others are relaxing and relieve high levels of arousal and tension/stress. All this, of course, depends on the "drug culture," the athlete, in question, is asked to follow.

To dwell on the exact chemistry of the steroidal habit. The natural rate of secretion of testosterone in men is about 10 mg per day; it is 0.26 mg in women. In reality, however, athletes take a total of 400-450 mg of different drugs, per day, in combined dosages, which may sometimes be higher in certain cases. The inference is obvious: enormous stress on the human system in balancing an unnatural act of human chicanery, or "enterprise."

Sporting glories have been underscored by one ritual from time immemorial: "Evil, be thou my good." And, methods to boost performance are not a modern-day saga. Just ponder over the fact that human nature is unchanging, and you'd be astounded to know that the noble Greeks were not averse to a little "cheating." Phylostratos and Galen, two great physicians of ancient Greece, contended that sportsmen, at the height of Greek magnificence, used many dietary methods to improve performance, including a novel, culinary idea, or a "miracle" -- eating sheep's testicles!

Today, it is all high-tech: a complex, super-specialised smorgasbord of "designer" drugs. Understandably, it is impossible to forecast which sportsperson might experience a given harmful side-effect of steroidal usage. The gamble is also risky, but athletes, and others, given the spectacular hold of the dough in sport, and human culpability, are prepared to swap it for the coveted gold, and also fame and wealth success would bring to one's doorstep. The winning edge, in sport, is of supreme importance, after all -- not the illegal, or unethical, side of dope.

Drugs are universal in their implications. However, drug tests are mainly administered at key competitions. Manipulating drug doses is, therefore, easy, because dates of major meets are always known in advance. Yet, the best way to stall the redundant use of drugs would be to spend a fortune in conducting spot checks at random, at any time of the year -- and, by surprise -- not just during, or before, an event. Some element of Hitchcockian suspense, after all, may help, even if the system would not be foolproof. Nothing is.

"Errors," wrote John Dryden, "like straws, upon the surface flow; He who would search for pearls must dive below." Sadly, a "drug-free" athletic world, in the present dispensation, is not only impossible, but also unachievable.

  The Lure Of Drugs

It's universally conceded that anabolic steroids are used by nearly all national and international athletes in a world dominated by muscularity and strength. Because, drugs have a positive effect in stimulating red blood cell formation, some runners and sprinters use them in the belief that a greater number of red cells will cause greater delivery of oxygen to the working muscles. Many athletes also believe that they cannot hope to compete favourably at high levels of competition without using drugs; athletes who would not ordinarily use drugs feel compelled to using them because they believe that they are at a serious disadvantage... if they are among "drug-free" competitors. Curiously, some athletes, who have been on drugs, have gone home free of blame; a few have been "caught" for no blemish, and then restored of their pride and medal.

There are athletes who take up to 1,000-2,000 mg of steroids per day, including amphetamines to help speed up metabolism... influenced by the current fad in the athletic world... That the most dangerous side-effects of overdoses are evident; and, so are the testimonials citing 30-lb body weight gain, tremendous improvement in strength, marked increase in stamina, and "personal bests" in sports performance. Yet, tumour development usually occurs over many years of use, as also shrunken testicles, low sperm count, infertility, baldness, loss of hair, irregular menses, and so on. The other effects often include hypertension, violent mood swings, even psychosis, loss of appetite, muscle cramps, vomiting, nosebleed, vertigo, headaches etc., The list is endless.

Inconsistency, however, dogs scientific and medical studies. Also, problems associated with drug abuse typically disappear after the stoppage of steroidal use. But, what is really amazing is the various modes of usage of anabolic steroids. It is quite remarkable, and somewhat terrifying, when one considers the wild experimentation that athletes often indulge themselves with/in. A majority of steroids used by athletes comes from underground sources -- unscrupulous pharmacists, drug supply houses, athletes who bring drugs back from foreign countries, vets, and several others. Most physicians abhor the use of steroids by healthy athletes, or persons -- not steroidal doctors, who, because of the lure of the lucre, or a "sincere" belief, argue that they can monitor the usage of drugs -- for quicker and better results. Faster. Higher. Stronger.

Ephedrine: Potency Magnified?

A naturally occurring substance found in plants of the genus, Ephedra, ephedrine has been used for thousands of years as a decongestant, and energy tonic. Oriental medicine too has used the substance, down the ages, and testifies for its incredible, completely natural, effects. Ever since it began to sport the mantle of bodybuilding's hottest new supplement, the sales pitch has been intense. Yet, one inescapable fact remains. For all its real benefits, ephedrine is, doubtless, a potent drug that may have serious, even fatal, consequences in some predisposed, or unsuspecting, individuals.

Athletes have developed a fancy for ephedrine. Because -- it helps one become stronger, have more energy for the next workout, and the next. It also helps one energise one's entire day, cuts on one's appetite, and, most importantly, reduces body fat. All without allowing one to lose any muscle mass. Ephedrine's safety record is quite impressive, too. In addition to its use as a recreational drug, or precursor of metamphetamine, ephedrine is rapidly gaining popularity both as an ergogenic that enhances strength, energy and endurance, and as a lipolytic that promotes fat loss while sparing lean body mass. This also makes it a popular weight-loss agent.

Research and scientific evidence indicates that ephedrine not only increases fat utilisation, but also spares muscle mass and maintains metabolic rate. This is all fair and dandy, but for individuals with underlying heart/cardiovascular disease, taking ephedrine may not be safe.

However, for all practical purposes, ephedrine could be thought as a cross betwixt adrenaline, one of the body's primary "fight or flight" hormones, and metamphetamine, an extremely puissant synthetic, stimulating drug. Aside from this, ephedrine, in lower amounts, has many of the same biological responses, as do adrenaline and metamphetamine; in higher doses, ephedrine produces almost all the adverse effects, albeit many users and proponents take comfort in the fact that the substance is an "herbal" product. Nothing, after all, is risk-free.   More Than Test[osterone] Drive

Though it may sound like a gastronomic sizzler named after a mythical god or legend, testosterone restores one's sexual drive/urge. It boosts muscle mass. Soon, one could get it as a gel… at the local chemist. What next? Something wackier. But, one thing is certain. It'll always remain dangerous.

What it does: helps concentration, and maybe memory; deepens voice at puberty; elevates lean muscle mass; cuts down on body fat; increases libido; stimulates hair growth; triggers normal development of male sex organ; and, increases bone density and growth.

How it is administered: IM injections, every week to 30 days; dose: 100 mg to 300 mg; patches on scrotal tissue, back, abdomen/thigh, on a daily dose of 4 mg to 6 mg; gel, 10 mg to 40 mg; on hairless skin, a few times a day; and, pill, 40 mg to 80 mg, by mouth.   Banned Drugs... At The Olympics

1. Beta-blocker, an OTC drug, which calms nerves and steadies hands, in events such as archery and fencing
2. Blood-doping, which improves oxygen supply and endurance, in track and field [T&F] events
3. Diuretics, which reduce weight, in weightlifting and judo
4. EPO [Erythropoietin], which increases RBC production, in cycling, tennis, and running
5. Human Growth Hormone, which builds muscle size and strength, in swimming and T&F
6. Insulin-like Growth Factor I, which increases muscle mass and reduces body fat, in swimming, and T&F
7. Steroids [Testosterone], which accelerate muscle growth and intense training, in T&F, and swimming

  The Indian Angle

Some Indian athletes, who were in the eye of the drug storm, lately, have been at the wrong side of the fence -- for several years. Drug use is an accepted fact; not a fact accepted by both athletes and coaches. However, monitoring drug indulgence has been as good as athletic standards. While a few coaches have been known to place their wards on a drug diet, with or without supervision, or knowledge of drug action, side-effects etc., so that the latter derive that extra "edge" over competitors, the overall results have been nothing but spectacular. Most Indian athletes have been found wanting on the international arena -- presenting a sorry image, drug or no drug. What's more, we all know how many of our athletes have failed drug tests -- in every major competition, as it were… But, one thing is imminent. Drug abuse is widespread; and, that is it.

A case in point: the blatant, indiscriminate use of drugs came to the fore at a national meet, some years ago, when an intrepid reporter, armed with a photographer, took actual pictures of used syringes, ampoules and several other "paraphernalia," strewn all over the "backyard" of the playing fields, without a care in the world. The pictures clinched the issue much better than a thousand words put together.

Result: nothing ever happened -- and, all was quiet. The only difference today is the emergence of "sophistication" in our athletes' drug usage patterns -- not the rudimentary "slant" of the example cited.                                          

More Specials Share your comments on this article  What do you think about the story?

Read what others have to say:

Number of User Comments: 5

Sub: doping ``And, while each type of steroid used exerts its peculiar effects in the body, athletes almost, as a norm, use those with chemical structures akin ... Posted by rohit

Sub: Chemical Athlete and Mind over Matter. When a sportsperson charged of taking drug on the basis of the tests, denies having taken any drug, it is not simply refuting the charge ... Posted by Sharad Korde, Thane.

Sub: Making of the chemical athlete The article on "Making of the chemical athlete" is highly praiseworthy. It shows the in-depth analysis of the writer on this subject, giving us an ... Posted by Seema

Sub: Comments It is a very informative article with a subtle view point!! It is for the readers to derive the best either as a juice or ... Posted by Badrinath

Sub: article I think this article is written badly, I am not sure what the author is trying to say. The author seems to have done a ... Posted by ramas

TORONTO, Ontario, Canada, May 1, 2003 (ENS) - Materials that form the gem diamonds mined in Guaniamo, Venezuela, originated on the ocean floor, according to a Canadian geologist who developed a new procedure to examine tiny inclusions in the gems.

Daniel Schulze, a geology professor at the University of Toronto at Mississauga, published a study today in the journal "Nature" which describes how diamonds are formed beneath the ocean deeps.

The diamond formation process begins, Schulze explains, when the Earth's mantle, the interior layer between the Earth's core and its crust, forces lava up onto the ocean's floor. The lava then solidifies into a volcanic rock called basalt.

Geology Professor Daniel Schulze specializes in study of Earth's upper mantle.(Photo courtesy University of Toronto) When the basalt interacts with sea water, its oxygen composition changes, Schulze says. "The volcanic rocks are altered to form new minerals. It's like the steel in your bicycle changing to rust in the rain."

Geological processes then move this altered basalt under the Earth's continental plates where heat and pressure turn the basalt into eclogite - red and green rocks that may contain diamonds, if carbon is present.

Over time, as the eclogite remains in the mantle, it eventually takes on the oxygen composition found in this environment.

"This process can erase or modify past evidence of the ecolgite's oceanic origins," says Schulze. "But because diamonds [contained within the eclogite] are impermeable, they act as time capsules, preserving inside themselves a record of conditions that existed during diamond formation."

In his study, Schulze and his team developed a new procedure using an ion microprobe to analyze tiny minerals, called coesite, in the diamonds.

Comparing these minerals to those in ocean altered basalts and mantle eclogite, the researchers found the coesite's oxygen composition a close match to that of the altered basalt, rather than the eclogite.

"This proves these diamonds have an oceanic heritage," Schulze says.

The fact that most minerals included in diamonds are very small - typically ten to a few hundred micrometres - has limited the variety of techniques that can be applied to diamond inclusion investigations, and until recently precluded oxygen isotope studies, the researchers say in the Nature paper.

It is the small beam diameter and high sensitivity of an ion microprobe that allows data to be collected from samples as tiny as minerals included in diamonds, and permits analysis of grains that are orders of magnitude smaller - nanograms - than possible by other methods, the scientists say.

"Using an ion microprobe and secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), we have now determined the oxygen isotope composition of mineral inclusions in eclogite-suite diamonds from the Guaniamo region of Venezuela, located on the Guyana shield," they write.

The Guaniamo area, located in western Bolivar State, Venezuela, is one of the most promising diamondiferous areas in South America, according to the Caracas based Guaniamo Mining Company which is now drilling in the area.

X-ray computed tomographic image of diamond bearing eclogite (Image by Diana Wiese courtesy U. Toronto)

The research team, which includes scientists from the geology departments at the University of Wisconsin and the University of Edinburgh as well as from the Guaniamo Mining Company, chose to examine this suite of materials because a number of features mark it as unusual, they said in the paper. "These include the facts that diamonds from this locality overwhelmingly belong to the eclogite suite, that coesite is unusually abundant as a diamond inclusion mineral, and that many of the diamonds have unusually low carbon isotope values."

Their analysis explains why mantle eclogites have an unusual oxygen composition compared to the surrounding mantle. "Although, over time, the eclogite assumes most of the mantle's oxygen characteristics, it may not have completely lost the oxygen composition it inherited as ocean altered basalt," says Schulze.

In addition, these particular diamonds, he says, seem to have "biogenic" carbon signatures, indicating that some of the carbon that formed the diamonds came originally from living organisms, such as ancient sea floor bacteria.

"Attached to the altered basalts, this carbon would have, in essence, gone along for the ride as the rock was thrust under the continents," the geologist explains. Heat and pressure would have turned the organic carbon into pure carbon in the form of graphite and, then finally, into diamond, he says.

Studying diamonds is one of the only ways scientists can learn about what is found deep beneath the Earth's crust and also the history of the early Earth and the environmental conditions that existed when the diamonds were formed.

"These tiny time capsules have indeed provided the missing link between the mantle and the crust," said Schulze.

Funding for this study was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the National Science Foundation.

Schulze is also researching diamond materials from Canada, United States, southern Africa, and Russia.

<a href=www.abs-cbnnews.com>Today@abs-cbnnews.com By ROMER S. SARMIENTO TODAY Correspondent

KORONADAL CITY - Farmers in South Cotabato province have complained of the skyrocketing prices of farm inputs reportedly by as much as 50 percent, or P200, prompting the provincial government to bring the matter to the attention of the Fertilizer and Pesticides Authority (FPA), which blamed the increase to the shortage of supply.

In response to the concern raised by South Cotabato Gov. Daisy Avance Fuentes, Alita Bornea, a ranking official of the FPA, said among the factors that triggered the increase in prices of urea and ammonia fertilizers were the export ban imposed by Indonesia on the commodity and the political crisis that hit Venezuela last year.

Fuentes earlier said that prices of the fertilizers have gone up from P400 to P600 a bag, stressing that this “prohibitive price increase is detrimental to our farmers who can barely survive the demands of living.”

“Indonesia stopped exporting fertilizers in mid-2000, which created a void in the local market as traders prefer sourcing the items from that country owing to its proximity to the Philippines,” Bornea said in reaction to the issue.

She said the Indonesian government banned the export of farm inputs “to reconcile it domestic needs.” Indonesia exports at least 100,000 metric tons of fertilizers a month.

In Venezuela, Bornea said the political crisis that hit it last year caused a shortage. Venezuela normally exports some 50,000 metric tons of fertilizers to the United States alone.

Bornea stressed that the is apparently being taken advantaged of by industry retailers.

In Luzon , FPA inventory as of March showed there are only 31,000 bags of urea and ammonia in the market, compared to the 74,089 bags needed by farmers all throughout the area.

In Visayas, 5,000 bags have been inventoried for the same period by the FPA, but the actual demand in the area is 34,473 bags, leaving a deficit of 29,473.

Mindanao, which is a largely agricultural island, has the widest shortfall of 69,089 bags. There are only 5,000 bags available but the demand is 74,089 bags.

Overall, the country has a short fall of 141,651 bags of urea and ammonia fertilizers following the total inventory of 41,000 bags, with a demand of 182,651 bags.

In response to the complaints of farmers in South Cotabato, Rey Legasti, provincial agriculture officer, said Monday that “the provincial government will implement a buy-one, take-one scheme to alleviate the plight of the farmers.” Under the scheme, farmers who are recognized by the provincial agriculture office can have twice the bags of fertilizers they would buy. He said that if a farmer would buy a bag of urea or ammonia in any agricultural stores in the area, the provincial government would pay for another bag.

Funding for the project will come from the national government, said Legasti. However, the farmers who earlier availed themselves of the 50-50 seed procurement program are not qualified to the new scheme.

Please send your comments or feedback to newsfeedback@abs-cbn.com

TODAY

A joint venture of TODAY newspaper and ABS-CBN Interactive

Alarming The abduction of five human-rights workers, two of whom have already been found dead, should be a cause for alarm. The five advocates were investigating a murder and were abducted by 20 armed men along that national highway in Naujan, Mindoro.

March 29, 2003, 1:40AM By CLAUDIA H. DEUTSCH New York Times

No one in the chemical industry will come out and say it. But the truth is, for chemical companies, the war in Iraq is not all bad.

Executives know that in times of war, people harbor nagging fears that burning Iraqi oil fields and rampant unrest in neighboring countries could quench the flow of oil and send prices way up, inevitably pushing natural gas prices up as well.

And that, they believe, makes the timing right to push Washington for energy policies that will at least curb the volatility of gas and oil prices.

"The fact that we are having a war reminds us again of the fact that we have to come to grips with a U.S. energy policy," said Greg Lebedev, president of the American Chemistry Council, the industry's main trade association.

To be sure, the industry has a lot to worry about. Its major input, oil, is expensive, and its outputs go to many cyclical industries that will weaken as a war wears on.

Even so, few industry experts think war will drive oil or natural gas prices significantly higher. The severe winter, coupled with the long run-up to war, did that months ago.

"The rise in natural gas prices was extraordinary over the last three months," said Klaus Peter Lobbe, chairman of BASF. "Some of that was the severe winter, but without the threat of war, prices would never have been this volatile."

Now the weather is warming up and there is no longer uncertainty about war. For two weeks, oil and natural gas prices crept down, until last week.

"A week ago, I'd have said that as soon as planes start flying, energy prices would go through the roof," said William Stavropoulos, chairman of Dow Chemical Co. "But Saudi Arabia is producing full out, Venezuela is coming back slowly, and it doesn't look like there will be huge damage to Iraqi oil fields."

The chemical industry has a huge amount at stake in whether the oil keeps flowing. It uses oil and gas as raw materials as well as fuel.

Thus, the council did not wait for war to break out to use it as a platform for seeking help.

On March 11, the council led a campaign to press the government to work with Canada and Mexico to increase the supply of available natural gas in North America, to reduce consumption by governmental agencies and to encourage conservation. It also asked that the president not support environmental regulations that discourage drilling in new areas or those that offer incentives to switch from coal to natural gas, thus causing a run on already tight supplies of natural gas.

In a sense, the industry is less concerned about the absolute level of prices than about the inability to predict them. The price of oil and natural gas varies daily; most sales contracts lock a specific price for products for a quarter.

209.41.172.174 March 7 2003

A report in The Straits Times Singapore has suggested that plastics could become the victim of the war in Iraq and political unrest in Venezuela.

According to the Singapore Plastic Industry Association (Spia), the prices of petrochemicals have surged by about 25 to 30 per cent in the last five months.

The price of crude oil has been climbing steadily since mid-November last year when they were about $25 a barrel, reaching a two-year high last Thursday of $39.99 a barrel.

The price of polypropylene surged from $660 to $860 per tonne over the same period.

"We have been trying to absorb the increases so far but from this month onwards, we would probably have to raise our prices," said Toh Cheng Wan, managing director of Chuan Durn Plastic Industries.