Chile Has a Clear Export Strategy
Foreign Minister Maria Soledad Alvear discusses the country's push for free trade agreements and relations with the U.S.
Considered the most disciplined free-market economy in Latin America, Chile started opening to foreign competition in the early 1980s and today boasts an average 6% tariff on all imported goods. The country of just 15 million inhabitants has free trade agreements with the European Union, Canada, Mexico, and Korea, and special trade accords with most of Latin America.
When the North American Free Trade Agreement was approved back in 1993, Chile was promised it would be the next country to get a free trade deal with the U.S. Although President Bill Clinton was unable to win fast-track negotiating power, Chile went ahead with the talks anyway, two years ago. Then the Bush Administration won fast-track authority last August.
The two countries finalized negotiations late last year, around the same time a similar U.S.-Singapore trade deal was wrapped up. Yet Bush signed the Singapore agreement in early May in a White House ceremony and made Chile wait for a June 6 signing -- in Miami. Why? Officials in Washington said they were "disappointed" with Chile's failure to support the Iraqi war from its seat at the U.N. Security Council. Political analysts in Washington and Santiago believe the delay was aimed at making the Chileans aware of how deep that disappointment was.
On May 28, the day after the U.S. finally announced the June 6 signing date, Chilean Foreign Minister Maria Soledad Alvear talked with BusinessWeek's Latin America Correspondent Geri Smith about U.S.-Chile relations and the prospects for free trade. They met in the Foreign Relations palace in downtown Santiago. Alvear, 52, a lawyer, formerly served as Chile's Justice Minister and as the Minister for Women after Chile returned to democracy in 1990 after 17 years of military rule. Edited excerpts of their conversation follow:
Q: What is the significance of the Chile-U.S. free trade agreement for the Chilean economy?
A: I'm very happy about it. We've negotiated a free trade agreement that's very good for both countries. Chile has a clear export strategy aimed at developing the economy and in particular aimed at diversifying our exports. We couldn't do that without this agreement. It's a seal of quality for our country as a reliable place to make investments.
We have signed agreements with the U.S., the European Union, South Korea, Latin America, and soon we'll sign with the non-EU nations. This gives us a very interesting horizon.
Q: This is said to be a "third-generation" trade agreement because it covers intellectual property, electronic commerce, services, and government procurement. In that sense, it could be a template for other trade agreements around the world. But some Chileans say the government wanted the agreement so badly it caved in by not insisting on eliminating U.S. anti-dumping rules. Chile also agreed to loosen its restrictions on capital flows even though those restrictions have protected the country from financial volatility in recent years.
A: We were very conscious that we weren't going to manage to eliminate U.S. anti-dumping rules, which are being looked at in multilateral forums like the World Trade Organization. Nevertheless, we agreed to mechanisms for dispute resolution that are quite modern. And with regard to capital controls, we're satisfied with what was achieved.
Q: How would you describe U.S.-Chile relations now, after the Iraq flap?
A: They're good. I was in Washington less than a month ago and had the opportunity to meet with Secretary of State Colin Powell, with U.S. businesspeople, and with members of Congress. I perceived that while the U.S. didn't like the fact that Chile was opposed at that time [to the Iraq U.N. Security Council resolution], that they view the free trade agreement positively.
We have a very full agenda of economic issues. We have work to do together on issues of democracy and human rights. We're working together on the Free Trade Area of the Americas. We've worked together to help the Organization of American States find a solution for the [political] problems in Venezuela. We're working together in many arenas.
Q: How long will it take to rebuild relations with Washington?
A: I believe each side understands the other's position, that there was a specific difference [of opinion], with the best of intentions, at a certain point in time...and at this point we have to look toward the future. The Singapore agreement was finished first because Singapore didn't have an agriculture chapter, and they didn't require translation of the agreement into another language. So, if you look at it objectively, there was never a delay [in signing Chile's agreement].
Q: Some say the Chile-U.S. Free Trade Agreement is a template for the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas, the 34-nation accord currently under discussion for the hemisphere.
A: This is a FTA negotiated between a small emerging-market country and the most developed economy of the world. If we're capable of reaching such an agreement, that improves the possibility of reaching a larger agreement among 34 countries with different levels of development around the region.
Some countries in the region believe that it's perilous for small developing countries to sign commercial agreements with industrial countries, but we are proof that it's not. The negotiation between Chile and the U.S. and the negotiations now under way between the U.S. and Central America will be very interesting and important for the Free Trade Area of the Americas.
Q: Chile already has agreements with all of Latin America except the Caribbean. Why is the Free Trade Area of the Americas important to you if you already have most of the region covered?
A: Because Chile is a small economy, and we have placed a big emphasis on exports. Having clear rules for all of the countries in the region will be an important stimulus. Chile's decision to open up to the world allowed us to double our gross domestic product in the 1990s -- something that had previously taken us 50 years to do. At the same time, we were able to halve the number of Chileans living in poverty.
We're very conscious of the fact that this process of market openings mean growth for countries. And if the countries carry out good social policies to lift people out of poverty, even better. That's why it's important that the region enjoy stable, solid democracies. Latin America has lived through very painful periods.
Today we have recovered our democracies, but the problem now is maintaining governability. Many of the problems we see in Latin America today are caused by painful poverty and pent-up demands from society. We believe there's a way out of this situation, and it's important to work together to increase the possibility of development and reduction of poverty.
Q: In just a few months, Chile will mark the 30th anniversary of the bloody military coup that ousted Socialist President Salvador Allende. The military ruled for 17 years, and Chile has been a functioning democracy only since 1990. You've been a Cabinet Minister in all three governments since then. How do you feel the country has changed?
A: If a person had been asleep all these years and woke up today, he would not recognize the country. Of course, the most important thing was the restoration of democracy, freedom, and respect for human rights.
Chile was an isolated country, and when it returned to democracy it had to reinsert itself in the world. Today, it's a key member of the most important political forums, including the U.N. Security Council. If you look at census figures, you'll find that 80% of the young people in college today had parents who didn't attend college. Among the poor, the number of households that own a washing machine has doubled [in these 13 years].
The role of women in public life has been remarkable. Chile has a woman serving as Defense Minister. When she and I go to Buenos Aires to meet with our Argentine [male] counterparts, they will see two women, and that reflects in many ways the changes Chile has gone through.
Q: As one of Chile's most prominent politicians, a leader of the Christian Democratic party, you're often mentioned as a probable front-runner for the next presidential elections to be held in 2006. Is it your goal to be President of Chile?
A: We are only halfway through the term of President Lagos. It's still too early to define [who the next candidate will be for the center-left coalition]. But if you ask me if a woman could be President of this country, I would say yes.
With so many threats in the world of terrorism, people are looking for leaders who work well in teams, who exercise power in a more inclusive way, by sharing more than imposing. That's often described as a feminine style of leadership, although it can be exercised either by a man or by a woman. In any event, I believe that men and women are equally able to exercise that responsibility. If [being nominated for the presidency] were to happen, I would definitely have to consider it.